The idea of Illinibucks is really
interesting. The college system involving with "buying priviledges"
is similar to free market in capitalism. In the current system, university
considers the needs of senior and junior for the graduation and systematically
provides privilege to them. It also offers students with good academic
performance some rewards, such as giving James Scholar privilege in class
registration, in order to encourage students participate in more honor programs
and discovery. Moreover, sometimes the priority in course registration depends
on major and college. Some course opening will first fulfill the need of
students from the major and college, then open to all students.
In our current system, since our rights
in making important choices are constrained by university policy, there will be
some inconveniences for students who are not capable to choose their highest
perference. The other candidates for Illinibucks include lining up for the
restaurant during lunchtime and making appointment with professors and other
organizations on campus. But I'll focus on course registration.
I would consider Illinibucks will be
threatened to senior who have needs for the privilege, and unfair for those who
pay efforts to earn privilege, such as James Scholar. For people who already
have high priority in class registration, they basically will not choose to
purchase the priority in registering the class. The utility of priority might
be greater for those who have less privilege and the privilege means,
"have or have not," and lower for those already earn some priority
and the privilege means "have a better situation." If I were in such
system, I would definitely use Illinibucks to purchase priority in my
graduation requirement, even though I already have priority in course
registration as senior standing and James Scholar. It is related to game theory
because I don't know other's action and don't want to lose my priority in the
game.
Price setting of Illinibucks will be
complicated and problematic if the price is too low or too high. If the price
is set too low, Illinibucks will make no difference when everyone has the same
priority. If the price is set too high, there might be less incentive for
general public to purchase Illinibucks, and only wealthier students can be
benefit. It will be unfair for the allocation of resource and contradicted to
the mission of the university. And we should also consider whether the system allow
auction or not, which means students can pay more to get prior in the line. If
so, the unfairness will be more serious. The college system will be
disorganized because price discrimination exists and there will be fair amount
deadweight lost. Moreover, just like people dealing with monetary policy,
university need to think about how many Illinibucks they "prints."
When something becomes a currency in university, we might worry about the
inflation and deflation.
In my opinion, a relatively fair
condition is every student get a fixed amount of Illinibucks when they start
their college life. As the resource is scarce, they can only allocate their
bucks in limited ways. And we should have a complete pricing system if we
decide to issue Illinibucks, For example, considering class registration,
university can charge more Illinibucks on some popular and small classes,
and less bucks for the others. In this case, students will carefully think
about whether they split their resource in minor purposes or pour the majority
of resource in something they really want to do. However, to ensure the
efficiency of the system, university should ban the black market and keep an
individual balance on every student.
In all, I consider Illinibucks is problematic rather than beneficial.
Since all students enroll in the university all pay the fair amount of tuition,
they should have a regulated order to use the resource and an honor system to
reward their efforts. Even we have some ideal policies and system to ensure the
function of Illinibucks, it is not applicable for the university because it
require lots of spending on research. I feel lucky that we don't have
Illinibucks.
I agree with your suggestion in the next to last paragraph, with the following caveat. I would have students receive a new allocation every semester they are enrolled and if they had left over from the the previous semester that would expire. This way students would learn to use the Illinibucks in a manner that helps them manage those bottlenecks they find most annoying.
ReplyDeleteI think your second to last paragraph brings up some good points in regards to the structure required to efficiently run a new currency system. I didn't even consider setting up a pricing strategy or the possibility of inflation or deflation. Like you indicated, the whole thing is a lot more complicated than the benefits warrant, and I definitely agree with you when you say you feel lucky to not have "Illinibucks."
ReplyDeleteI think it would be interesting to think of a situation in which every student was given 20 Illinibucks at the beginning of the semester. Then imagine if the price to get into a class with high demand was 20 Illinibucks (very high). There probably would still be enough students to fill the class because some people would definitely save all their Illinibucks. What if there were enough people who did this to fill the class twice? What would happen to the people who simply saved enough but cannot bump someone out of the class because they saved just as much? Even worse, what if the class then completely excluded people who had better grades than the people who held onto their Illinibucks? I can see why this could be a very bad idea for the University.
ReplyDelete